The second in command and a relief pilot took over and Flight TK204 diverted to John F. Kennedy International Airport (KJFK), where it landed safely.

Captain Ilcehin Pehlivan, 59, collapsed over the Canadian territory of Nanuvut, according to Turkish Airlines spokesman Yayah Ustun, who said, “When first aid to our captain on the plane was unsuccessful, the cockpit crew decided to make an emergency landing, but he died before landing.” The Airbus A350 landed at KJFK eight hours after departing from Seattle.

• READ MORE: Associations Urge Airbus to Reconsider Single-Pilot Cockpit Proposal

Having joined Turkish Airlines in 2007, Pehlivan’s medical exams were up to date and no health problems were reported at his last exam, according to the airline. The cause of death has not yet been determined.

The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) has been exploring technology to enable single-pilot operation of large passenger aircraft, at least initially with an eye toward allowing crew members to rest and eliminating the need for relief pilots on long flights. EASA has cited the need for further measures when it comes to responding to an incapacitated pilot.

But perhaps in anticipation of a “slippery slope,” European and U.S. pilot groups have challenged the initiative.

The U.S. Airline Pilots Association (ALPA), the European Cockpit Association (ECA), the Oneworld Cockpit Crew Coalition (OCCC) and the Skyteam Pilots Association have joined to oppose reduced-crew operations, saying, “We are engaging in a worldwide campaign to ensure the current standards that have helped make aviation the safest form of transportation won’t be eroded.”

Editor’s Note: This article first appeared on AVweb.

The post Turkish Airlines Airbus A350 Captain Dies Mid-Flight appeared first on FLYING Magazine.

That statement is precisely what one does not wish to hear when test-running an aircraft following a maintenance event. The situation worsens when the aircraft is a $109 million F-35A Lightning II fighter. In January, Stars and Stripes reported that on March 15, 2023, “a hand-held flashlight left inside an F-35 engine by maintainers at Luke Air Force Base last year caused $4 million in damage.” It seems that after using a flashlight to inspect the poorly lit intake of the F-35, the maintainer failed to clear the tool before test-running the engine.

During the post accident investigation, investigators found a flashlight missing from one toolbox. The 56th Fighter Wing aircraft suffered an excess of $4 million in damage to the engine. Thankfully, no one was injured in the accident, but the engine could not be repaired locally.

This is a classic and all-too-common case of foreign object damage (FOD).

This Is FOD

FOD can be categorized as foreign object damage or debris based on the context one is referencing. FOD is a broad term that applies to just about anything. The FAA defines in Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5210-24 Airport Foreign Object Debris (FOD) Management that FOD is “any object, live or not, located in an inappropriate location in the airport environment that can injure the airport or air carrier personnel and damage aircraft.”

FAA AC No. 150/5380-5B Debris Hazards at Civil Airports addresses FOD and the ramifications of such. One key highlight states that “foreign objects on airport pavements can be readily ingested by aircraft engines, resulting in engine failure.” The FAA lists several possible FOD objects, many of which you will instantly identify as commonplace in aircraft operations. In section B of the AC, the FAA calls out “aircraft and engine fasteners (nuts, bolts, washers, safety wire, etc.); mechanics’ tools; flight line metal (nails, personnel badges, pens, pencils, etc.); stones and sand; paving materials; pieces of wood; plastic and polyethylene materials; paper products; and ice formations in operational areas.” 

FOD-Related Accidents

Just how bad is the FOD problem? One might say that the issue is an epidemic. The FAA devotes quite a bit of attention to it, and rightly so. FOD is hazardous and can negatively impact operations.

The FAA website cites the Current Airport Inspection Practices Regarding FOD (foreign object debris/damage) report, stating that FOD exists in many forms, comes from many sources, and can be found anywhere in an airport’s air operations area (AOA). The report explains how damaging FOD can be to aircraft, puncturing tires, punching holes in airframes, and nicking turbine blades or propellers. And in extreme cases, engine failure. Damage is not isolated to just aircraft or equipment. Airport employees are also susceptible to FOD-related injuries. Errant bolts or other foreign objects on the ramp could be propelled by prop wash, jet engine blasts, or helicopter rotors, turning them into mini-missiles.

• READ MORE: Breaking Down Sudden Stoppage Inspections

The report states that FOD costs the U.S. aviation industry $474 million annually. The global aviation industry’s losses are an estimated $1.26 billion annually. These totals include direct and indirect costs, such as flight delays. The FAA is asking for airports, airlines, and the general aviation community’s assistance in documenting the occurrence of FOD and submitting data to the FAA FOD database.

Despite all the awareness campaigns and actions taking place, FOD is still a significant problem that may be growing. A recent Air Force Times article states that “foreign object debris was one factor that led the number of ground accidents to nearly double from 11 in 2022 to 21 in 2023.” If anything, rates of occurrence are headed in the opposite direction. In March, USA Today reported that United Flight 1118, a Boeing 737 taking off from Houston’s George Bush Intercontinental Airport (KIAH) ingested bubble wrap into the engine, causing a midair fire. Thankfully, the incident did not result in injury.

Unfortunately, the losses are not solely in physical damage. One of the more infamous FOD-induced incidents did not fare so well. On July 25, 2000, Air France Flight 4590 departed Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport (LFPG). Prior to rotation, Concorde struck a piece of metal with its right front tire, causing it to explode and rupture the integral fuel tank. Fuel leaking from the ruptured tank ignited, creating a loss of thrust in engines 1 and 2. The aircraft lifted off momentarily but crashed into a hotel, killing all nine crew, 100 passengers, and four people on the ground. 

The Bureau Enquêtes-Accidents (BEA) report identified the FOD as a Continental Airlines DC-10 thrust reverser door wear strip that had fallen off after maintenance. 

FOD awareness and prevention deserves our attention. These examples and others illustrate that there is seemingly no end to stories of FOD causing significant property damage and loss of life, including one instance of a self-inflicted fatal FOD accident. Columbia STS-107 was lost and its space shuttle crew perished upon reentering the atmosphere while returning from a mission. According to NASA, a loose insulation panel dislodged and damaged the carbon heat shield material on the orbiter’s left wing, eventually causing the craft to succumb to the extreme heat of reentry.

FOD can come from a variety of sources, and not all incidents are the result of negligence—nature can be equally culpable. Most people are familiar with the story of Captain Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger and the “Miracle on the Hudson.” On January 15, 2009, US Airways Flight 1549 departed New York’s LaGuardia Airport (KLGA) bound for North Carolina’s Charlotte Douglas International Airport (KCLT). Approximately six minutes into the flight, the Airbus 320-214 ingested a flock of Canada geese, disabling both engines. Thankfully, Sullenburger’s skill saved the lives of all souls on board by safely ditching in the Hudson River. 

Even smaller flying objects can cause huge problems. Andrew Warwick and Blake Love recently reported to KJWN in Nashville, Tennessee, for a service call. A Challenger 350 experienced a dual-engine, nonstart condition. They arrived to find the APU inlet packed with dead cicadas. It appears that cicadas are drawn to the APU’s warmth and noise. Operators in heavy cicada areas like this are advised to run their APUs sparingly and check for FOD frequently.

FOD Prevention

To begin a FOD prevention program, start with the following:

• Identifying causes.

• Establishing an FOD awareness program.

• Establishing a maintenance program.

The AC mentioned earlier then breaks down each of the above actions with detailed guidelines to help one succeed in the fight against FOD.

• READ MORE: 5 Things You Can Do to Help Prevent Foreign Object Debris

Another resource the FAA makes available is its Foreign Object Debris Program. The website (faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/fod) reveals several tools, resources, and technical publications for managing a successful FOD program.

Marcela White, co-owner of Tavaero Jet Charter, knows FOD is serious business. When asked who was responsible for FOD risk mitigation at Tavaero, White’s simple response was—everyone.

“Pilots, mechanics, and airplane cleaners are all trained to check for any FOD damage on the airframe or in the engines,” White said. “Pilots are the last line of defense and perform their preflights with a sharp eye. Anything beyond obvious visual damage gets escalated to the maintenance department. The job is not over after the flight either. The pilots go back through everything during post-flight inspections. Crewmembers follow an extensive checklist that includes servicing the aircraft fluids, cleaning the windows and windshields to ensure no chips are found, checking oxygen levels, and checking the airframe and engine blades for FOD.”

I met John Franklin, the head of safety promotion at the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), during the T-C-Alliance online coffee chats early in 2020. I asked Franklin about his legacy of fighting FOD.

“In terms of FOD, it’s where I started my safety career, as the U.K. Defense FOD Prevention Officer, or the ‘Fodfather’ as it was called at the time,” he said with a smile.

Franklin broke down the steps EASA is taking to raise FOD awareness. 

“From our side, we are trying to promote the topic wherever the opportunity arises,” he said. 

“Every year, the EASA team participates in the annual FOD Walk at our local airport at Dusseldorf [Germany]. This provides a great opportunity to promote the importance of active FOD prevention. After the FOD Walk last year, we published an article on our Air Ops Community website [easa.europa.eu/community/topics/fod-prevention].”

Even with all EASA’s efforts, more work remains, especially with regard to getting the word out. 

“We also promote FOD, particularly when we have other promotional events and webinars on maintenance safety and airport ground handling,” Franklin said. “From our analysis, these certainly seem to be the communities that have the largest role in stopping FOD from causing a safety issue to an aircraft. Additionally, we promote the topic of clean cockpits to airlines having had some occurrences with FOD jamming flight controls or causing other problems to avionics.”

Much like a 12-step program, Franklin recognizes that awareness of the FOD problem is only the first step. One must put in parameters to stop FOD at the source.

“It’s also important to have a FOD analysis program to further identify the sources of FOD, so you can manage them at the source,” he said. “There is no point just continually cleaning away FOD without thinking where it is coming from and how to stop it.”

How the Experts Stop FOD 

FOD control begins with attention to detail, tool control, and housekeeping. There are solutions designed with this in mind. FODS LLC, located in Centennial, Colorado, provides FODS mats to prevent any material from entering the airfield by clearing the tire treads before entering the airport. They recently completed a project at Terminal 5 at Chicago O’Hare International Airport (KORD).

I asked some of the top names in the industry to help me map out strategies to deal with FOD. James Logue, the director of maintenance at Latitude 33 Aviation in Carlsbad, California, told me how his team approached the FOD issue, and provided a new perspective.

“It’s important to think about FOD proactively,” Logue said. “Think about an object and its placement in terms of how it might become FOD. I’ve seen large water bottles in a galley cabinet leak out, causing water to get under the floor and into the belly, then freezing in flight, causing a fuel valve cable to become jammed. Consider what can happen if an item breaks, spills, moves in flight, where it might migrate to, what holes it could fall in, etc.”

Despite best efforts, FOD will eventually find its way to the airport. But once you identify an object as FOD, how do you dispose of it? 

Foreign Object Debris is a company specializing in FOD receptacles. According to its website (foreignobjectdebris.com), the firm “educates the community about FOD in hopes of helping to save a loss of money and potentially lives.” If you visit the site, check out its series of FOD blogs.

Jon Byrd, executive director of aviation and TCSG state aviation program adviser for Georgia Northwestern Technical College (GNTC) in Rome, contracts with Shark-Co Manufacturing to build custom foam molds that incorporate the minimum tool list and fit them into the student’s toolbox. This could have helped out the F-35 maintainer with the missing flashlight.

Speaking of tooling, Snap-on now sells a line of FOD prevention tools. I recently read about its quarter-inch Drive Dual 80 Technology Standard Handle Foreign Object Damage Ratchet design online and how it helps to prevent FOD in sensitive work environments. The cover plate and reverse lever are permanently affixed to the ratchet head with rivets to prevent debris from small parts. The tool meets FOD and foreign material exclusion (FME) program conformance.

Duncan Aviation is the world’s largest privately owned business jet service provider. I recently met with the team and inquired about Duncan’s FOD efforts. Darwin Godemann, the team leader of the Technical Education Center, offered the following insights: FOD can be anything—a wrench, pen, eyeglasses, or even rocks and stones, and i originate in many ways—objects falling out of pockets, a wayward tool, dirt and debris, or a pilot spilling their coffee.

FOD does pose a significant threat to aircraft, one that can cost the operator tens of thousands of dollars and compromise the safety of the aircraft and its function. For example, debris can result in improper stress and wear on a wire, causing an electrical fire. Coffee spilled six months ago can drip into nooks and crannies and cause corrosion. A tool left where it shouldn’t be can shift and jam a flight control. Debris from an airfield can be sucked into an engine.

Here are some examples of Duncan Aviation’s program:

• Tool control policies require shadowboxing all toolboxes and the end-of-work inventorying of tools

• Regular FOD awareness and training with a clean-as you-go policy. If you see something, pick it up.

• Double-inspection systems. Before it puts a panel back on or closes an area of the aircraft opened for work, a second set of eyes checks it out. In addition to a QA check, this ensures there is nothing in there that doesn’t belong.

• Awareness campaigns companywide. The line department tugs have magnets under them that pick up magnetic objects as they drive on the ramp.

Here are Duncan’s best practices implemented to develop an MRO FOD program:

• General housekeeping: A clean-as-you-go mentality is the most important first step in FOD prevention.

• Effective tool control system: Account for all tooling regularly and at the end of a job. Inventory lists or tool shadowing make this task much easier.

• OK to close inspection: Inspecting all areas where maintenance was performed to ensure nothing unwanted is left behind.

FOD control is potentially everyone’s problem, so it’s also everyone’s responsibility. Safety is mission critical in aviation. Failure to control FOD could be deadly.

This feature first appeared in the July/August Issue 949 of the FLYING print edition.

The post Fight Against FOD Never Ends appeared first on FLYING Magazine.

The German manufacturer on Tuesday said it completed initial testing of its flagship aircraft’s propulsion unit, comprising a pair of electric engines and mounting system. For the first time, the engines were taken up to full throttle on a test bench at the company’s headquarters in Munich.

According to Lilium, the propulsion unit performed as expected, representing a key step toward the aircraft’s first crewed flight planned for later this year. The firm will need to demonstrate crewed operations for the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) in order to receive type certification in 2025 ahead of a planned 2026 commercial launch.

“For my fellow co-founders and myself, the first test run of the Lilium Jet propulsion unit marks another high point in our journey,” said Lilium co-founder Daniel Wiegand. “It was our shared belief in the radical potential of electric jet technology that brought us together in 2015 and continues to drive Lilium.”

The propulsion unit engines were developed by Lilium in collaboration with a handful of suppliers. Honeywell and Japanese firm Denso supplied the electric motor, Dutch manufacturer Aeronamic provided the compressor fan, and Sweden’s SKF delivered electric motor bearings.

The mounting system, which forms the rear part of the aircraft’s wings and front aerofoils, contains the propulsion unit and a vectoring system.

The system is designed to power the Lilium Jet’s 10 independent battery packs, which feed 36 electric ducted fans. The fans are embedded in the aircraft’s fixed wings and allow it to take off vertically like a helicopter.

The jet will primarily serve routes between towns and inner cities, cruising at 162 knots on trips spanning 25 to 125 sm (22 to 109 nm).

Lilium began production of its flagship aircraft in December with the delivery of the first of seven fuselages to its assembly line in Wessling, Germany. Since then, it has begun manufacturing battery packs and installing an electric propulsion unit serial production line at the facility. Those systems initially will be deployed on the ground and eventually be integrated on the aircraft used for flight testing.

On Tuesday, Lilium said supplier Aernnova has completed the build of the propulsion mounting system. In addition, partner Sener this month delivered the first set of servo-actuators, which rotate the propulsion unit as the aircraft transitions between vertical and horizontal flight.

“Over the past years, we have invested heavily in the technology and secured extensive IP rights,” said Stephen Vellacott, chief technology officer of Lilium. “We now move a step closer to first manned flight and beyond that to the era of commercial electric flight.”

After obtaining EASA type certification in 2025, Lilium intends to secure the same approval from the FAA by leveraging a Bilateral Aviation Safety Agreement between the regulators. It is the only eVTOL manufacturer with certification bases from both the FAA and EASA.

In the U.S., Lilium intends for the jet to initially serve customers in South Florida and Southern California through a partnership with newly formed eVTOL operator UrbanLink, which in May placed an order for 20 aircraft. Earlier this week, UrbanLink partnered with Ferrovial Vertiports to build electric aircraft infrastructure in those markets.

Like this story? We think you’ll also like the Future of FLYING newsletter sent every Thursday afternoon. Sign up now.

The post Lilium Completes Initial Testing of eVTOL Jet Propulsion Unit appeared first on FLYING Magazine.

The FAA—which so far has published final airworthiness criteria for two air taxi designs, Archer Aviation’s Midnight and Joby Aviation’s flagship model—issued an advisory circular (AC) that would create the foundation for certification of powered lift vehicles, such as eVTOL aircraft. The AC, which lays out acceptable means for showing compliance with FAA Part 21 requirements for special class aircraft, is open for comment for 60 days.

EASA, meanwhile, updated its special condition for vertical takeoff and landing aircraft (SC-VTOL) rules to incorporate new requirements agreed upon with the FAA, covering safe flight and landing, handling qualities, and single-point failures.

Simultaneously, the regulators together revised Safety Emphasis Items (SEI) lists—which determine an agency’s level of involvement in aircraft validation projects—for parts 23, 27, and 29. According to the FAA, the partners have reduced SEI requirements and placed greater responsibility on the authority actually certifying the aircraft.

“The FAA and EASA have achieved a significant milestone on the path to certifying eVTOL aircraft,” the FAA said in a statement. “This also marks important progress in our effort to more closely align rulemaking and policy initiatives between the United States and the European Union. We’re committed to ensuring the safety of the flying public both at home and abroad.”

Both the FAA and EASA have announced ambitious initiatives designed to cement their respective AAM industries as the world’s biggest and best. But before tackling challenges such as eVTOL infrastructure, which will require a network of vertiports and electric chargers to support the aircraft, the regulators first need to define clear certification pathways for the novel designs.

The FAA’s new criteria, intended for powered lift designs with maximum weights of 12,500 pounds and a maximum capacity of six passengers, were developed using standards in FAA parts 23, 27, 33, and 35. The regulator said it leveraged its work on Archer and Joby’s type certification applications to develop the standards, claiming they will create a more efficient path to developing the certification bases for powered lift projects.

For example, the FAA will no longer need to publish airworthiness criteria in the federal register for public notice and comment, as it was required to do for Archer and Joby’s aircraft, for designs that use the standards in the AC. Applicants can now propose certification bases that draw from previously approved designs, such as Archer’s Midnight, or use equivalent level of safety findings to adopt existing airworthiness criteria for their own projects.

EASA, which had already published an initial set of standards for VTOL projects, made a few key changes in the second issue of its SC-VTOL criteria. Unlike the FAA AC, it will not be subject to public consultation.

The most notable change is an increase of the maximum certified takeoff mass (MCTOM) from 7,000 pounds to about 12,500 pounds, one of many examples of the regulator adjusting standards or wording to better align with the FAA AC.

Another key provision is the introduction of a requirement around electrical wiring interconnection systems (EWIS), which transmit data and signals across aircraft systems. Manufacturers will need to prove these can be operated without risk.

So far, China’s EHang is the only eVTOL manufacturer in the world to achieve type certification, awarded by China’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAAC) for the company’s EH216-S in October. Already, the manufacturer has completed commercial demonstration flights and begun mass production.

Things are moving a bit slower in the West, much to the chagrin of U.S. lawmakers and regulators, who don’t anticipate AAM operations at scale until 2028. It’s no secret that Western officials are wary of Chinese drones and electric vehicles, and the country’s growing AAM industry could be a threat to their dominance in that sphere as well.

Monday’s announcements should help accelerate the technology’s growth in the U.S. and Europe. In the coming months, expect the list of eVTOL companies with type certification bases to grow beyond Archer, Joby, and the handful of companies, among them Lilium and Volocopter, collaborating with EASA.

Like this story? We think you’ll also like the Future of FLYING newsletter sent every Thursday afternoon. Sign up now.

The post FAA, EASA Release New Certification Criteria for Air Taxis appeared first on FLYING Magazine.

The powerplant manufacturer, which is a subsidiary of Continental Aerospace Technologies, has submitted its certification package to the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and  expects certification by the end of the year.

• READ MORE: AERO Friedrichshafen Encourages Pilots to Arrive in Their Own Aircraft

According to Continental, the CD-170R variant is “an evolution” of its CD-170 for advanced fixed-wing, single-engine aircraft and will feature similar characteristics. The CD-170R, however, does not have a gearbox, shaving its weight by 37 pounds.

“The 170 hp turbocharged engine combines the state-of-the-art, full authority digital engine control (FADEC), resulting in lower fuel consumption and dual redundancy,” Continental said in a statement. “While fuel consumption is application based, this 4-cylinder model is expected to conservatively burn approximately 7.9 gallons of jet-A-1 per hour when in cruise. Similar to its predecessors, the CD-170R will debut with a time between replacement (TBR) of 1,200 hours and will increase with time in service.”

According to David Dörner, vice president of global research and development for Continental Aerospace Technologies, the engine was engineered with pilot needs at the forefront.

“This is a major innovation milestone in Continental’s history that will allow us to serve even more pilots and operators in the [GA] industry,” said Dörner. “Controlled via FADEC with rotorcraft-specific software mapping, pilots can now direct their focus toward the critical phases of flight and mission, alleviating the need to manage both the throttle and the collective simultaneously.”

The post Continental Unveils CD-170R Rotorcraft-Specific Heavy Fuel Engine appeared first on FLYING Magazine.

Following the start of aircraft production in December, the company on Tuesday began building the aviation-grade battery packs that will power its flagship Lilium Jet: a seven-seat eVTOL designed for regional air mobility (RAM) services.

Each Jet will be fitted with 10 independent battery packs, intended to boost range. The packs are also redundant, allowing the aircraft to fly and land safely if one fails. According to Lilium, production follows extensive testing all the way down to the individual battery cell.

The first battery packs off the assembly line at the manufacturer’s purpose-built battery factory, just outside its headquarters in Munich, will be used to perform verification testing ahead of the Lilium Jet’s first piloted flight. That milestone is being targeted for late 2024.

“The start of production of the battery packs is a proud moment for Lilium,” said Yves Yemsi, chief operating officer of Lilium. “Battery technology is central to the goal of delivering sustainable regional air mobility, including overcoming the challenges of developing and industrializing a battery pack that will meet the stringent safety standards of aircraft certification.”

Lilium’s battery packs are composed of lithium-ion cells with silicon-dominant anodes. The company claims these enable greater energy, power, and fast-charging capabilities than graphite anode cells, which are much more common in batteries today. However, many automakers, including Porsche, Mercedes-Benz, and General Motors, are eyeing transitions to silicon anodes, which are believed to provide a higher energy density than graphite.

The packs are designed to meet European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) safety standards around shock resistance, heat resistance, containment, and redundancy. According to Lilium, it has secured intellectual property rights for the technology.

The German manufacturer says its batteries are designed to support a higher power and energy density for regional—rather than urban—air mobility operations, with the implication being that they are more powerful than those of competitors focused on urban air mobility (UAM).

RAM and UAM are subsets of advanced air mobility (AAM). RAM seeks to connect cities within a region, while UAM focuses more on intracity operations. The Lilium Jet is expected to cruise at 162 knots on regional trips spanning 25 to 125 sm (22 to 109 nm).

Each Jet’s 10 battery packs will power electric jet engines produced by Honeywell and Japan’s Denso. Propulsion comes in the form of 36 electric ducted fans embedded in the aircraft’s fixed wings. The unique configuration sacrifices hover efficiency for improved cruise efficiency and lower noise.

Lilium began building its flagship aircraft in December with the delivery of seven fuselages to its manufacturing facility, ramping up production in February with the installation of a serial production line for the Jet’s propulsion systems.

These components and others will be assembled into seven aircraft, which the company intends to use for piloted flight testing and, later, for-credit evaluations with EASA. It hopes to achieve type certification in 2025 ahead of a planned commercial launch in 2026.

In February, Lilium designated Orlando International Airport (KMCO) as the hub for its U.S. operations in Florida.

Like this story? We think you’ll also like the Future of FLYING newsletter sent every Thursday afternoon. Sign up now.

The post Lilium Begins Producing Battery Packs for Electric Jet appeared first on FLYING Magazine.

The 30th anniversary AERO event runs from April 17-20 in Friedrichshafen, Germany, with the career days on April 19 and April 20.

• READ MORE: Rolls-Royce Launches Flight Testing of Pearl 10X Engine

According to show organizers, some 25 companies are participating in the recruiting effort, including Liebherr Aerospace, Rheinland Air Service (RAS), Diehl Aerospace, Rheinmetall, EASA (European Union Aviation Safety Agency), Air Alliance, Hillsboro Aero Academy, Textron Aviation, Junkers Aircraft, Lufthansa CityLine, Zeppelin, Trelleborg Ceiling Solutions and Platoon Aviation.

“The current forecast of Boeing sees a global need for a total of around 2.29 million new employees for the aviation industry by 2042, including 649,000 pilots, 690,000 new technicians and 938,000 cabin crew,” said Tobias Bretzel, AERO show director. “In addition, there will be a need for additional personnel in general aviation, business aviation and the military. The prospects for young people for a successful career in aviation and aerospace are better than ever. The AERO Career Days offer interested parties a unique opportunity to obtain comprehensive information at first hand.”

Editor’s Note: This article first appeared on AVweb.

The post Europe’s Biggest GA Show to Host Career Opportunity appeared first on FLYING Magazine.

According to Tecnam, the P2012 STOL is designed specifically to operate at airports and airstrips characterized by “extremely short runways with demanding operational constraints.”

The aircraft, while designed as STOL, still maintains “a 99 percent commonality of parts with the standard P2012 Traveller series aircraft” and still manages to fill the needs of a niche market that relies on a certain level of performance and flexibility, the company said.

About the Aircraft

The P2012 STOL is a twin-piston aircraft with a maximum gross weight of 8,113 pounds and  useful load of 2,831 pounds. It can be configured for up to nine passengers with amenities such as USB ports, individual air outlets, dedicated reading light, seat pockets, and cup and mobile phone holders.

The multimission capability of the aircraft allows it to go from a passenger carrier to air ambulance or cargo hauler within minutes.

• READ MORE: Tecnam P2012 STOL on Track for 2023 Certification

The cockpit features a G1000 NXi avionic system, GFC700 specifically tuned autopilot, and ADS-B In/Out. The flight deck features connectivity with Bluetooth, Flight Stream, Iridium along with weather radar, stormscope, inset map, and ForeFlight Synthetic Vision.

The aircraft also has a wider cabin than other STOL in its class, according to the Italian manufacturer.

Aircraft Performance

According to Tecnam, at the maximum takeoff weight of 8,113 pounds, the P2012 STOL can lift off in 1,033 feet, clearing a 50-foot obstacle in 1,394 feet. The landing distance over an obstacle is reported to be 1,181 feet.

With the production aircraft already in the final stage of the assembly line, the P2012 STOL is ready for the first deliveries to customers, the company said.

The aircraft is scheduled to be on display at Sun ’n Fun Aerospace Expo in Lakeland, Florida on April 9-14.

The post EASA Certifies Tecnam P2012 Traveller STOL Variant appeared first on FLYING Magazine.

Airbus on Thursday unveiled the full prototype of its four-seat CityAirbus NextGen to the public. The electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) design makes its debut ahead of its anticipated maiden voyage later this year.

CityAirbus NextGen is a zero-emission, lift-plus-cruise design for a variety of missions in major cities and urban environments, including passenger transport, medical services, and ecotourism. Airbus will partner with operators and airlines to fly the model worldwide.

At first, the eVTOL will be flown by a pilot. But it’s equipped with an operational automated flight mode that could enable autonomous operations in the future.

“Rolling out CityAirbus NextGen for the very first time is an important and very real step that we are taking towards advanced air mobility [AAM] and our future product and market,” said Balkiz Sarihan, head of urban air mobility (UAM) at Airbus.

Airbus revealed the NextGen concept—a descendant of its CityAirbus demonstrator—in 2021. The aircraft is designed for a pilot to fly up to three passengers, with a range of about 50 sm (43 nm) and cruise speed of 75 mph (65 knots). It weighs approximately two tons and has about a 40-foot wingspan.

The NextGen design includes a V-shaped tail, fixed wings, and distributed electric propulsion system, with eight electric propellers and 16 electrical power units. Airbus in 2021 said these features will keep sound levels below 65 dBA during fly-over and below 70 dBA during landing.

The aircraft was built using a mix of in-house and externally supplied components, such as wings from Spirit AeroSystems, flight controls from Thales and Diehl Aerospace, and electric motors from MagicAll.

CityAirbus NextGen will include a human machine interface, with a single piloting stick controlling all aircraft axes and replacing cyclic, pedal, and collective controls. Airbus claims the design is a first in the helicopter industry. Using the stick, a pilot will be able to perform takeoff and landing, climb, descent, acceleration, deceleration, turn, and approach.

Airbus will certify the air taxi in the enhanced category under the European Union Aviation Safety Agency’s (EASA) Special Condition for VTOL (SC-VTOL) regulations. The manufacturer describes these as “the most stringent certification requirements.” FAA certification is expected to follow in the months and years beyond.

The unveiling of the NextGen prototype took place as Airbus opened its CityAirbus test center in Donauwörth, Germany, a site dedicated to eVTOL aircraft development. Donauwörth will host remaining tests of the aircraft’s electric motors, rotors, and other systems such as flight controls and avionics, required before it makes its maiden flight. Airbus began operations at the facility in December after powering on the first NextGen model.

Airbus intends to fly the air taxi in countries such as Italy, Germany, Norway, and Japan, as well as regions such as Latin America. But it will need to establish operational partners and infrastructure such as electric aircraft chargers prior to a rollout.

Recently, the manufacturer expanded its partnership for service in Italy—which already included ITA Airways, nation’s flag carrier—to include vertiport operator UrbanV and green energy firm Enel, which will help airports transition to electric infrastructure.

It also intends to collaborate with international helicopter and fixed-wing lessor LCI to develop business models and partnership scenarios revolving around AAM strategy, commercialization, and financing.

Like this story? We think you’ll also like the Future of FLYING newsletter sent every Thursday afternoon. Sign up now.

The post Take a Look at Airbus’ Newly Unveiled Electric Air Taxi appeared first on FLYING Magazine.

The German firm on Monday said it has begun installing a serial production line for the Jet’s electric propulsion units at its manufacturing facility in Wessling, Germany. The company expects the first prototype propulsion systems—which will support for-credit type certification testing with the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)—to roll off its production line in the second quarter of 2024.

The production of electric propulsion systems for Lilium’s flagship Jet marks another key milestone in the commercialization of the aircraft, which the company began building in December. It hopes to achieve type certification in 2025 ahead of a global launch in 2026.

Lilium’s propulsion assembly line was designed in partnership with automation and robotics supplier Schnaithmann Maschinenbau GmbH, with which the manufacturer has worked for years to develop production plans. Schnaithmann will also provide workflow design, jogs, and tools for Lilium’s aerostructures assembly and final assembly line.

“The electric jet engine is a unique, core Lilium technology, critical for aircraft performance and for which we have secured not only a team of highly qualified system suppliers but also important intellectual property,” said Jan Nowacki, senior vice president of manufacturing for Lilium. “With the support of Schnaithmann, we look forward to implementing state-of-the-art manufacturing solutions capable of being scaled up and replicated for high-volume production.”

Lilium and Schnaithmann developed initial production plans several years ago in anticipation of this week’s announcement. The manufacturer’s aerostructures assembly line—located in the same building as the newly announced propulsion system assembly line—already uses Schnaithmann equipment to handle the Jet’s wings and canards.

The Wessling site also comprises a testing and manufacturing center, propulsion and aerostructures facility, final assembly building, and battery assembly building and logistics hub.

“With nearly 40 years of experience in supplying automation technology to global industries, we are proud to participate in the industrialization of the Lilium Jet,” said Gerd Maier, member of the Schnaithmann management board. “The eVTOL industry has the potential to change aviation in a positive, sustainable way, and we are delighted to be able to play a key role in helping Lilium scale up towards high-volume production.”

Lilium delivered the first of seven Jet fuselages to Wessling in December. The company will manufacture seven aircraft to use for EASA type certification validation, which it expects will begin late this year.

The manufacturer’s all-electric seven-seater is expected to fly passengers between towns and inner cities, cruising at 162 knots on trips spanning 25 to 125 sm (22 to 109 nm). The firm said the aircraft’s propulsion unit will be key in providing performance, unit economics, and comfort for regional air mobility (RAM) services.

RAM is a subset of advanced air mobility (AAM) that involves connecting cities across a broader region, as Lilium plans to do. It contrasts with the urban air mobility (UAM) approach adopted by many competitors, which intend to concentrate flights within a single city or metropolitan area, such as New York or Los Angeles.

The Lilium Jet propulsion unit consists of electric jet engines (or e-motors) integrated into a propulsion mounting system, which forms the rear part of the aircraft’s wings and front aerofoils. The company said the system will improve payload and aerodynamic efficiency, reduce noise, and provide thrust vector control to maneuver the Jet through all phases of flight.

Several components for the propulsion unit are provided by suppliers such as Honeywell, which is working with partners Denso, Aeronamic, and SKF to deliver e-motors, fans, and electric motor bearings, respectively.

The system powers 36 electric ducted fans embedded in the Jet’s wings. The unique architecture differs from competitors such as Joby Aviation or Archer Aviation, which are using tilt rotors that reorient themselves during the transition between vertical and forward flight.

In 2023, Lilium assembled the first complete electric engine for the Jet on a pre-series line. The engine is designed to deliver what the manufacturer claims is an industry-leading power density of over 100 kilowatts, despite the system weighing just less than 9 pounds.

Crewed flights of the Lilium Jet are expected to begin later this year as the company eyes for-credit testing with EASA. But Lilium is also the only eVTOL manufacturer with certification bases from both EASA and the FAA.

Earlier this month, the company designated Orlando International Airport (KMCO) as a key hub for its RAM service in Florida, which it announced in 2020. Fractional aircraft ownership company NetJets agreed tentatively to purchase 150 Lilium Jets and operate them across the Florida network, which will be supported with maintenance services from Bristow Group. FlightSafety International has agreed to train an initial cohort of Florida eVTOL pilots.

Lilium further announced support for Florida Legislature House Bill 981, which would designate Orlando International Airport as Florida’s official AAM test site. The legislation would also create a pathway for safe, efficient vertiport permitting in the state.

Last week, Lilium placed an order for 120 Star Charge electric aircraft charging systems, intended to juice up its ground and flight test aircraft. The manufacturer will also deliver chargers to customers investing in vertiports, further supporting its RAM ecosystem.

In addition, Lilium last week partnered with private and commercial operator PhilJets—which agreed to purchase 10 aircraft—to explore RAM networks in the Philippines, Cambodia, and across Southeast Asia.

Like this story? We think you’ll also like the Future of FLYING newsletter sent every Thursday afternoon. Sign up now.

The post Lilium Prepares to Ramp Up Production of Electric Jet Propulsion Units appeared first on FLYING Magazine.